Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/09/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:09:58 +1000
References: <63C28AFB-46A8-4F3A-ABD1-D58A638C0660@mac.com> <BLU0-SMTP6491DA390CE25EDFBBAB148CF60@phx.gbl>

I have no clue what portion of Koak's bottom line comes from film but they
do of course produce the sensor for the M9.

Cheers
Geoff

*That which does not kill us makes us really really ouchie!*
**



On 29 September 2011 12:04, Vick Ko <vick.ko at sympatico.ca> wrote:

> Um, nothing unless Fujifilm gets into the same trouble?
>
> :-)
>
> Vick
>
>
>
> On 9/28/2011 9:56 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>
>> <http://247wallst.com/2011/09/**24/kodak-its-credibility-gone-**
>> now-had-viability-trouble/<http://247wallst.com/2011/09/24/kodak-its-credibility-gone-now-had-viability-trouble/>
>> >
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george at imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/**imagist <http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See 
>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>>  more information
>>
>>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See 
> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>  more information
>


In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Kodak in trouble? What does this mean for Leica?)