Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/09/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The 60 micro might have been a nice comprize on that thought. Its hard to focus manfully though you almost have to leave it on AF. And not light or compact. But a very convenient focal lengh. Ask Sebasti?o Salgado! The 60 macro would be the first lens I'd get if I got into Leica R. I've always said that. Mainly in my dreams. -- Mark R. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > From: Gene duprey <grduprey at mchsi.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:20:29 -0500 (CDT) > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Dear Nikon > > Does seem kinda high, I was looking at one earlier today, and decided to > buy > the 105/2.8G Micro Nikkor instead. > > gene > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 4:38:00 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: [Leica] Dear Nikon > > Dear Nikon: > 500 bucks for a AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G? > In your dreams. > > > -- > Mark R. > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information