Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yep your Nikons make perfect sense for what you do Jayanand and an M9 would be the wrong tool. But Ive never followed this 'religious' position that M lenses must only be used wide open (nor the commandant about thou shalt not use a tripod)! Most of mine are fast and I use them wide open if I want/need to but much of the time do not. They don't perform worse when you stop them down a couple of f stops! They do allow you to control the depth of field exactly as you want and they will still do a superb job if I need them to be fully open. Cheers Geoff *"Isabelle for Prime Minister"* ** On 25 August 2011 13:19, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> wrote: > The S2 looks extremely tempting, judging from the exceptional results, but > for my preferences in photography, it is not a great tool - neither is the > M9 - I would not buy either. I need long lenses and low light performance. > Besides, my ability to focus lenses wide open is deteriorating with age > (otherwise why shoot LeicaM?). So I keep drooling for a Nikon D3s....(-: > Cheers > Jayanand > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Which raises some very interesting and relevant points. I agee that the > S2 > > would be the wrong tool for your style of photography Nathan. > > Still it's hard not to be impressed when you see the photographs it makes > > of > > course. > > > > At the natural light model photography class I Iattended (run by Peter > > Coulson http://www.koukei.com.au/ ) I asked him why he was shooting > with > > a > > full frame Canon dSLR rather than the Hasselblads that he normally uses > in > > his studio. I've watched him working with those tethered and studio > > lighting > > and he is very good at what he does. He cited the ISO restrictions with > the > > Hasselblad and the limited focal lengths. I'd add the lack of very fast > > glass personally > > Unsurprising there were 14 photographers with dSLRs (Nikons and lonely > > Sonys) and one M9. From model and students...."oh it's not a film > > camera?cool!" > > > > Still when he was demonstrating using I guess about the 200 end of a zoom > > for one setup, I was in close and speaking with the (delightful) model. > In > > this case the levitating Izzy. > > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/137293471 > > I certainly wouldn't feel handicapped with S2 instead of M9 for fashion > > type > > shots, in or out of studio. Oh my, the lenses and files it has. > > > > For landscape photography of course the S2 could be superb but the M9 is > > showing strengths there too with some advantages in portability for > > example. > > Ask Tina or Paul Roark or he who has not yet come out there!. > > > > I WANT one for both purposes. > > > > But carry the S2 and an extra lens or two everywhere on the streets > > of Barcelona or New york, not so practical. > > > > Horses for courses of courses. > > > > Cheers > > Geoff > > > > *"Izzy you are a photographer's dream" ANTM judges* > > ** > > > > > > > > O > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >