Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I should add that the Midland Ontario ELCAN wasn't just some low-cost manufacturing plant. Walter Mandler designed some of my favorite lenses where, including the last non-aspheric versions of the 35 'lux and 90 'cron, as well as the classic 75 'lux and of course the Noctilux 1.0. -rei On 08/20/2011 10:39 PM, Rei Shinozuka wrote: > Minor quibble--the first Mac was 128K. We got ours with Imagewriter > from Columbia as part of the Apple University initiative. > > My other point, which you alluded to, was that Leica did in fact > outsource design and production to Portugal and Canada and made > partnerships in the Far East in the 60s and 70s. For a variety of > reasons they have to date reversed most if not all of these > initiatives. I'm not as familiar with all of the history as others on > the list--perhaps they can explain Leica's outsource and insource > history. > > -rei > > > On 08/20/2011 08:02 PM, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote: >> When Apple introduced the Mac 512 in 1984 it stressed the fact that its >> production line was almost fully automatic. Many manufacturing companies >> assume a labor component in the finished product of 50 to 85%. Apple >> boasted >> a manufacturing labor component of about 1%. At the time I was chair >> of the >> Computer Committee of the City Univ. of New York. I, and several >> colleagues, >> were treated to a tour of the Cupertino, CA facility with plenty of >> wine and >> gourmet meals thrown in. NYC was in IBMs back yard and Apple wanted >> to gain >> a foothold. When we visited the plant there were very few employees >> actually >> building Macs. Most of the manufacturing workers were in the assembly >> and >> test departments and in shipping. There were plenty of software >> engineers, >> programmers and paper jockeys. >> >> Apple tried, and mostly succeeded, in getting a profit margin of 30% on >> manufacturing when most of the competition worked hard to get a 15% >> margin. >> That explains, in part, why Apple, started 30 years ago by two guys in a >> Palo Alto garage, is now the most valuable company in the world with >> assets >> exceeding those of Exxon. It also has 76 billion USD in the >> bank.Apple has >> continued its philosophy of keeping manufacturing labor costs low by now >> assembling most of its hardware in China and Taiwan. Both countries have >> labor rates a fraction of those in the USA and Europe. >> >> Now if Leica kept its design facility in Germany but manufactured its >> cameras and lenses in Asia it would be far more price competitive in the >> world camera market. Quality need not suffer. My Rollei 35SE made in >> Singapore is the equal of another Rollei 35 made in Germany. My >> Olympus DSLR >> 500 made in China works just fine. >> >> Leica is no stranger to offshore manufacturing. The Leica CL, made by >> Minolta in Japan, is a superb camera and its 40 mm Summicron, also >> made in >> Japan, is one of the Leica's best normal lenses. Leica itself has >> partnered >> with Fuji and Panasonic. It has made some of its best cameras and >> lenses in >> Portugal and Canada. If it adopted the Apple model, Leica's sales would >> increase, its profits would soar, and Herr Kaufman would be ecstatic. Te >> only unhappy people would be some members of the LUG. You know who >> you are. >> >> Larry Z >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information