Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] D700 or D7000
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:21:37 -0400

Its not the pixel counts which excite me..
Its the quality in the end becuae each pixel is realyl a very very nice
pixel. Big. With lots of room around it to breath. And a nice  "pitch".
That's what its all about and what makes medium format better than full
frame and full frame better than cropped.
-- 
Mark R.



> From: Lottermoser George <imagist3 at mac.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:15:16 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] D700 or D7000
> 
> On Aug 14, 2011, at 10:11 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Why dont you post some of your medium format stuff George?!?!
>> Maybe sans Flash
> 
> The last time I shot medium format digital was testing the CFV 39
> and can be seen here: <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=1761>
> 
> Before that the rentals were for "product catalog shots"
> of no particular photographic interest; and using vintage MF backs
> with smaller pixel counts than my 5D (though cutting edge at the time).
> 
> George
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] D700 or D7000)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] D700 or D7000)