Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000 long reply IMGs
From: afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com)
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:44:57 -0400
References: <2107342.1313324788071.JavaMail.root@elwamui-royal.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

OK so ignore my last post.

> Alastair Firkin wrote:
>
>>No, but I was not going to hunt out another DMR to back up the first one.
>>In all likelyhood it would have survived, but there were other reasons.
>>The DMR is so easy to clean sensor wise, that was not a big issue, but
>> the
>>weatherproof sealing on the hybrid is dubious in comparison to Helen's
>> Oly
>>and the Nikons at the upper end.
>
> I recall a photo posted on this list of a Nikon with attached lens
> drenched from rain (was it Howard's?).  My R8/DMR has been equally wet,
> with no adverse effects.
>
> I understand about the backup issue!  Much easier to buy a backup for a D3
> than for a DMR.  I bought a backup DMR when the R-system was discontinued,
> because a backup is considered the prudent thing to have on hand.  I
> thought that if the kayak rolled, or a mountain goat kicked the camera off
> a cliff, I wouldn't be completely without a body for my R lenses.  In the
> two years I've had the backup I've only needed the second body when I sent
> one (the "backup" body) to Leica for minor service.
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>




In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Thinking about a D700 or D7000 long reply IMGs)