Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think a crop circle camera is very apropos for a very small camera body. Line a half frame Olympus pen body was to a Nikon F. The old and creaky M8 is the same size and weight as a new cutting edge stupendous M9. I looking for a digital Rollei 35. A 24x36mm sensor in a body which acts as a life support system for it. A body about he size of a Rollei 35. Or what we call a point and shoot. It could be an Evil camera. But I'm in tough with my dark side. When that comes out the current cropped compact rangefinder Oly's and pen f's and Ricoh's will be laughable. So maybe I'll wait. -- Mark R. > From: John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:32:28 +1200 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] D700 or D7000 > > I own an M9. No, Mark (who has decried crop circle cameras but owns > desirable Leica lenses) was talking favourably about the 1.5x Ricoh... > > John > > -----Original Message----- > >> So (other than IR filters) what makes this better than an M8? >> >> john > > If you mean the M9 v M8 there are a lot of benefits: > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information