Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Something a lot longer than wide?? Don't know now that you mention it. I always thought of it as 6x 17. Ken On 8/6/2011 8:02 PM, Tina Manley wrote: > Much, much better. I really like the second one but I'm not sure I'd call > it a pano? What do you mean by pano? > > Tina > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Ken Carney<kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote: > >> Here is an image I have never been really happy with, but it occurred to >> me >> a pano may improve it. Here is the original: >> >> http://www.kencarney.com/**Places/tif_0017_std.html<http://www.kencarney.com/Places/tif_0017_std.html> >> >> And here is how I remade it today as a pano: >> >> http://gallery.leica-users.**org/v/kcarney/badwater+basin+**2011.jpg.html<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/kcarney/badwater+basin+2011.jpg.html> >> >> I'm thinking just give it up and go back and try again (in the winter). >> Any thoughts much appreciated. >> >> Ken >> >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >> more information >> >> >