Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digital vs. film cost
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:24:31 -0400

I've bracketed 4x5 film but not bigger making each shot I guess go into two
figures! But ain't dead yet.


Mark William Rabiner
Photography



> From: Lottermoser George <imagist3 at mac.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:15:14 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital vs. film cost
> 
> 
> On Jul 18, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> 
>> Not only is it not pennies but dollars a frame but part of transparency
>> shooting is bracketing. Which means your covering yourself whenever you 
>> can
>> with lots of exposures of any semi critical subject out in the field
>> shooting city or land scapes if its worth getting its worth getting right
>> and you learn a lot about your materials in the processs. Also the best
>> "dupe" is the one make at the time in camera. So you are in effect backing
>> yourself up  holding your figure down.
> 
> There IT is.
> 
> Words from a fellow brother
> who has most certainly shot transparencies
> for commercial use by
> advertising agencies, magazines and corporate clients.
> 
> Each set-up required a minimum of 3 brackets X 2.
> That's 6 sheets of 8x10 or 4x5 or half a role of 120 (6x6).
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Digital vs. film cost)