Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - where did the detail go/over-saturation?
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:32:58 -0400
References: <CAEve6XiE+Q8Y50s7nbfBi2a=p3PK6Y2PNjo325ur1HahSBF-Og@mail.gmail.com>

i notice the flash was used

is that part of the problem?

ric


On Jul 16, 2011, at 3:51 PM, scleroplex wrote:

> brilliant!!
> :-)
> bharani
> 
> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:18:33 +0200
> From: Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp at gmx.de>
> Subject: [Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - where did the detail
>       go/over-saturation?
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Message-ID: <4E21C7E9.7020406 at gmx.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed"
> 
> Thanks to all for the constructive comments,
> 
> I put them into practice:
> 
> 1) I recalibrated my monitor with a Spyder 2.0 and
> started over again from RAW in LR
> 
> 2) Converted to jpeg in LR as usual for the LUG Gallery
> (highest quality)
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/DMS/album150/Recalibrated_Monitor_Centre.jpg.html
> 
> Still no detail!
> 
> 3) converted to tiff in LR - the detail I could see in
> lower petal of the middle flower in the original RAW
> image is still there
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/DMS/album150/Recalibrated_Monitor_Crop.TIF.html
> 
> Looks like the problem of what looks like
> over-saturation and loss of detail is a format
> conversion problem
> 
> Cheers
> Douglas
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - where did the detail go/over-saturation?)
In reply to: Message from scleroplex at gmail.com (scleroplex) ([Leica] IMG: Field Poppies - where did the detail go/over-saturation?)