Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Medium Format Digital
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 13:41:16 +0530
References: <CAH1UNJ2cByyah3tvt+yC4-UZAEbnA_BxDkPAtqayDO8-6yyU1A@mail.gmail.com> <7F3E2370-990E-4571-A5C5-B353D63F4451@frozenlight.eu> <CAF8hL-G5hY9YR6AmPSy_Y9gGBaxjhbsvRAb2t285VvuoyHFVoQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DDBEC6F-268D-4A5F-A2D0-75E282F03A1A@yahoo.com>

Bob,
That shot of yours gives me vertigo just looking at it!
Cheers
Jayanand

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at yahoo.com> wrote:

> My P45+ stitched in portrait orientation (18mm shift on each side) with the
> 35mm lens gives a rough equivalent of a medium format 17.5mm lens. That
> translates into what, about a 12mm rectilinear 35mm equivalent?
>
> And you want what?
> See:
> http://www.rgaphoto.com/GT/content/Valley_View_Pano_W_large.html
>
> This image is from 3 main segments produced by using 3 back shifts with a
> portrait oriented P45+ and 35mm lens, for each segment. The 3 back shifts 
> of
> each segment were stitched together from the images of the 35mm lens 
> shifted
> in portrait orientation. This roughly equates to the view of each of the 3
> segments equaling the field of view of a 17.5mm medium format lens/ 12mm
> lens on a 35mm format system.  3of these were stitched(swinging the camera
> on a panoramic head) to give the image. It was then cropped. The file is
> over 2.2GB.
>
> Give me a place to stand and I will hang this image!
>
> In all seriousness there are some correctly stated and some overstated
> items in this expose. But all in all, medium format for landscapes is at a
> really nice place right now...
>
> Anyone want to buy some Hassy V and Canon equip? :-)
> Bob
>
> Bob Adler
> http://www.rgaphoto.com
>
> On Jul 6, 2011, at 9:25 PM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com> wrote:
>
> > My pipe dream is that someone, well, Fuji specifically :-) would make a
> >
> > 18x49mm sensor, and build a digital RF system for it. The sensor size is
> > just about the same size as the "full frame" 35mm, so the technology and
> > cost is known (remember that full frame Canon and Sony are as "low" as
> > $2500).
> >
> > The result would of course be a cropped digital XPan. The lens should be
> > much easier to design - heck, lets make them all F2.8 while we are at it.
> >
> > Sell the whole system with 3 lens (30, 45 and 90 equivalent) for $10,000
> to
> > $12,000, and I bet they will sell at least as many of that as Pentax
> 645D.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
> > // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
> > // richard's personal photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
> > [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all
> previous
> > replies in your msgs. ]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Medium Format Digital)
In reply to: Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Medium Format Digital)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Medium Format Digital)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Medium Format Digital)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Medium Format Digital)