Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jul 3, 2011, at 3:14 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > I think the math on a f2 90 vs. an f 1.8 75 comes out to be about the same. > There is no way your pictures are going to sharpen up when you had problems > before with a 90 becuae you are now using a 75. > Which shudder this spelling makes me shutter... > speeds and f stops are you using? > Which camera? > > > Mark William Rabiner > > >> From: Kenneth Frazier <kennybod at mac.com> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 16:46:22 -0400 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: [Leica] Use of Leica 1.4x magnifier.... >> >> Folks, >> >> I know some on the list have used the 1.4x magnifier. I think I recall >> seeing >> a post somewhere by Hoppy about it. >> >> Have any of you used it with longer lenses (75 or 90), and if so, what's >> your >> opinion? >> >> I want to be able to use my T-E 90 on my M9, but it's really fiddly on the >> focus. >> >> So, I'm considering the "new" CV 75/1.8 as an alternative to the 90. >> >> Thoughts, opinions, experience? >> >> TIA, >> >> Ken >> -------------------------- >> Kenneth Frazier >> kennybod at me.com >> kennybod at mac.com >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information