Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/06/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M lens 21mm F2.8 pre ASPH
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:41:21 -0500
References: <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9131C15CC@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36052EA0F3@case-email.casefoods.com>

The whole sentence is:

"*Generally speaking: this lens is a commendable performer and a slight
improvement on the SA 34*. It does not bear the Leica badge with full
honour."





On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:10 AM, David Rodgers <drodgers at 
casefarms.com>wrote:

> John wrote:
>
> >>He also says "It does not bear the Leica badge with full honour."<<
>
> A polite way of saying there may be better options out there? :-)
>
> For most general photography if the lens matters that much it probably
> doesn't matter.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Regards,

Sonny
http://sonc.com/look/
Natchitoches, Louisiana

USA


Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] M lens 21mm F2.8 pre ASPH)
In reply to: Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] M lens 21mm F2.8 pre ASPH)
Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] M lens 21mm F2.8 pre ASPH)