Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/06/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New Leica M Stuff
From: msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:26:12 -0700
References: <78360B7C-76FD-4E7A-A744-C1F95F887902@charter.net> <CA26873F.1095D%mark@rabinergroup.com> <20110622030649.GA63482@selenium.125px.com>

the zeiss 21/4.5 not usable with digital m

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Tim Gray <tgray at 125px.com> wrote:

> On Jun 21, 2011 at 05:37 PM -0400, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>
>> The CV 21 was a compact 21 with no compact alterative from Leica other
>> than
>> trying to use an old SA or using a heavy large expensive Elmarit or
>> Summilux.
>>
>
> What about the Zeiss 21/4.5?  Sharp as heck, smaller than the new Leica,
> and pretty much no distortion.  Oh, and cheaper.
>
> I was nominally interested in the new Leica 21 until I saw the distortion
> figure.  For $3k and a larger lens than the 21/4.5, it should at least
> compete in that area.
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See 
> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for
>  more information
>



-- 
  -------------------------------------
  regards, mehrdad


In reply to: Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] New Leica M Stuff)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] New Leica M Stuff)
Message from tgray at 125px.com (Tim Gray) ([Leica] New Leica M Stuff)