Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/06/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm not sure what you were measuring, but on the frame shown here: http://www.ethertongallery.com/html/specialprojects/negative/details/6.htm we're talking about a negative with the sprockets cut off on one side. 35mm double perforated film has 8 sprocket holes per 24x36 frame, exactly. This frame is 8 sprocket holes long. The other sprocket holes are cut off. It might be a dupe, but it was shot on double perforated film and the sprockets were later cut off on one side. If it were a larger image, shot on single perforated film and this were the whole piece of film the image would be more than 8 sprocket holes long. >Simple measurement with a ruler shows that the film strip is full 35 mm >width. So it is unlikely that a row of sprocket holes was cut off. The LTM >Leicas had a film frame counting sprocket with teeth on top and bottom. The >film strip shows no indentations on the blank side. Copying cameras were >designed to use both single sprocketed and unsprocketed film. The only >parsimonious conclusion is that the HCB film strip is a copy of the original >negative. > >Larry Z > >_______________________________________________ >Leica Users Group. >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Henning J. Wulff Wulff Photography & Design mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com http://www.archiphoto.com