Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/06/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for all your responses to this guys. Since I'm not sure of the lighting conditions I'll be working with I'm going to take a few rolls each of Ekter 100 and Portra, 160 & 400. I should be able to get something out of that lot! One factor I forgot to ask about - do you have an impression that any of these films has a particularly broad exposure latitude? Thanks again, Paul. Paul Hardy Carter www.paulhardycarter.com www.theconstanteye.com www.twitter.com/paulhardycarter Skype: paulhardycarter Location and Directions Mobile: +44 (0)75 4018 1784 Studio: +44 (0)20 7277 0778 On 3 Jun 2011, at 08:49, Kenneth Frazier wrote: > > On Jun 2, 2011, at 10:29 AM, PHC wrote: > >> What's considered the best of the bunch these days? >> >> Apparently I can now get very useable results from 400asa now? > > > Paul, I've used all the films mentioned so far, plus one that has not been > mentioned, the new Ektar 100, which scans beautifully, very fine grain, > smooth, great color. > > Also, the "new" Portra 160 scans very well. > > Ken > --------------------------- > Kenneth Frazier > kennybod at me.com > kennybod at mac.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information