Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Henning, How is the low light performance of the GH2 compared to the G1/GF1? Cheers Jayanand On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Henning Wulff <henningw at archiphoto.com> wrote: > I've a Olympus e-p1 and have the Lumix GF-1, G1 and GH2. It might be just > familiarity, but I like the control layout of the Lumix series a lot better > than the Olympus, but I might still upgrade the e-p1 to an e-p2 for the > in-body IS, which makes all the other odd lenses I have stabilised, as well > as the Panasonic 20/1.7. > > The GH2 is a big step up in image quality. For long lens stuff I now tend > to > use the GH2 and 100-300 rather than a crop sensor Canon and 100-400, as the > achieved quality is overall just as good if not better. The current 18mp > Canon sensor is slightly better than that of the GH2, but the 100-300 is a > lot better than the Canon 100-400, and I've tried 5 of the latter by now. > The Oly e-p2 has similar noise levels as the GH2, but not quite when you > push it and it doesn't have the resolution as the noise reduction removes > some. The e-p2 has a very nice viewfinder, but as others have noted it's a > bit awkward. The GH2 focusses faster as well. So... the GH2 is definitely > my > favourite m4/3 body. > > The Panasonic lenses are all very good to outstanding, the GH2 sensor is > very good and the whole thing weighs a fraction of what the Canon stuff > weighs. > > >> ?Olympus vs. Lumix , which bodies do people use and like. ?EVF have they >> gotten any better. ?Pros and Cons. ?Help I'm drowning in unhelpful >> information so I need actual shooters to help me decide. >> >> ernie nitka >> > > -- > > ? ? ?Henning J. Wulff > ?Wulff Photography & Design > mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com > ?http://www.archiphoto.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >