Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/03/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMGS: check out Keith Wessel's photographs
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:58:51 -0600
References: <38C7FB98-0C4A-4D57-BF3E-AF6432C7F390@mac.com> <4D798495.6010704@panix.com> <F1C731CE-FC27-45CA-B521-4DC41AEC8698@mac.com> <444198.62728.qm@web86707.mail.ird.yahoo.com>

On Mar 11, 2011, at 2:28 PM, FRANK DERNIE wrote:

> George, public employees are -not- net tax payers since the tax they 
> nominally 
> pay goes straight into their next pay packet, topped up by other real 
> taxpayers 
> contributions. If a public employee was directly paid his after tax income 
> and 
> paid no tax, or is paid his nominal income and pays the tax the end effect 
> is 
> the same.
> All public employees cost taxpayers something I am afraid.
> The arithmetic is straightforward.


Frank, let us try and frame this within the larger systemic reality.
Public services cost taxpayers $$.
In order to provide those services we must hire employees, rent offices, 
purchase equipment, etc.
State public employees also "really" pay federal income taxes;
they "really" pay sales taxes, gas taxes, and all other taxes;
and yes to some degree they also pay a portion of their own salaries in 
state taxes.
In in all cases they qualify as "real tax payers.
They also circulate their $$ within the economy.

Now let us drop all pretense around public service "employees" and simply 
get to the heart of the matter.
Some people appreciate the services provided by a well regulated government.
This would include the mass of people who cannot afford to purchase those 
services on their own.
Other people believe that all services should be privatized.
This would mostly be people who can afford to purchase any and everything 
that desire.
Yet others believe even more services should be provided by their government.
This would include the absolute bottom in terms of income and resources.
And all others believe in one or another proportion between public and 
private services;
according to what they need and/or want in life.
Now:
If you can afford a private school education you probably resent supporting 
public education.
and the list could go on and on.

Whether the state hires employees to provide services to the citizenry
or hires private contractors to provide the same services the services will 
need to be paid for.

With out any doubt
if we privatize everything
those business will run to earn the largest possible profits for their CEO's 
and shareholders.
How does that hold down costs?
This is what we see with the insurance companies.
NOT THE MOST EFFICIENT WAY TO DELIVER HEALTH CARE SERVICES.

Until people are willing to actually pay a reasonable wage to the people
who grow, pick, cook, serve, deliver their food to the super market,
clean their homes, pickup their trash, build, maintain and plow their roads,
deliver their mail, stand at their store's cash registers, teach or provide 
care for their children
and on and on - in my opinion - we need to provide a modicum
of safety, health and education to these, our servants.

Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist







Replies: Reply from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] IMGS: check out Keith Wessel's photographs)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMGS: check out Keith Wessel's photographs)
Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] IMGS: check out Keith Wessel's photographs)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMGS: check out Keith Wessel's photographs)
Message from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] IMGS: check out Keith Wessel's photographs)