Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nathan's PAD 27/1/2011: that's why I want a MF film scanner
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 07:58:30 +0530
References: <038B68DC-3B2D-4034-9B5F-3ACAB55C3242@frozenlight.eu>

Nathan,
Tough to make out on an online jpg, I think a print would be required to
tell the difference. My advice is that if you really have a photo you want
to print large, get a professional drum scan done, otherwise stick to the
Epson.
Cheers
Jayanand

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at 
frozenlight.eu>wrote:

> Actually the picture was taken a couple of weeks ago, but I just got the
> negs this week. Scanned on my Epson 700, it is not bad, but I am sure it
> would be better with a film scanner. Sadly, the flextight scanners are a 
> bit
> out of my range, given that we bought a new car last year ;-)
>
>
> http://www.greatpix.eu/All/Picture-A-Day/4253606_netUM#1170406922_Ypdnu-O-LB
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
> YNWA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 27/1/2011: that's why I want a MF film scanner)