Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jan 22, 2011, at 6:48 AM, Montie Talbert wrote: > Gravitating toward the one with less detail (second one). > I'll figure out why later after coffee :-) > > Montie > >>> I like both versions, though I think I'm leaning towards the second, > which seems more natural. I wonder whether there's a middle ground - a > sort of "Goldilocks" version, which has some, but not all of the punch > of the top image, which may be the best of both worlds. our eyes are pretty used to the way things look, so if it seems too good to be true, then it's likely not true.... the second one. Steve > > > > > Mark Pope, > Swindon, Wilts > UK > > Homepage http://www.monomagic.co.uk > Blog http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog > Picture a week (2010) > http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2010 > Picture a week (2009) > http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009 > (2008) > http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008 > > On 22/01/2011 00:48, George Lottermoser wrote: >> <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=4755> >> >> c&c always welcome >> >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information