Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMGs: Too much? or Not enough?
From: mark at whitedogs.co.uk (Mark Pope)
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 07:08:17 +0000
References: <AD7021CB-A798-4298-AA97-58596F282D3F@mac.com>

I like both versions, though I think I'm leaning towards the second, 
which seems more natural.  I wonder whether there's a middle ground - a 
sort of "Goldilocks" version, which has some, but not all of the punch 
of the top image, which may be the best of both worlds.




Mark Pope,
Swindon, Wilts
UK

Homepage               http://www.monomagic.co.uk
Blog                   http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog
Picture a week (2010)  http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2010
Picture a week (2009)  http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2009
                (2008) 
http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php?gallery=paw/2008

On 22/01/2011 00:48, George Lottermoser wrote:
> <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=4755>
>
> c&c always welcome
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMGs: Too much? or Not enough?)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMGs: Too much? or Not enough?)