Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Voightlander 15mm
From: leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson)
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:38:05 -0600
References: <AANLkTi=Pc3Bm1xitC+Sh8JegNCT=a9XUMD_7tiVybHfB@mail.gmail.com> <20110114023524.GP11089@jbm.org> <AANLkTikRAG0b2JiJHVaqURzcDTfA=NPy12=-oDmG-6g3@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Sandy,

It works pretty well but sometimes you need to run the images  through corner
fix <http://sites.google.com/site/cornerfix/>.  Occasional corner cast
reminiscent of the m8.
For the money, it's quite a deal.

Leo Wesson
Photographer/Videographer
817.733.9157
www.leowesson.com


On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:18 PM, sandy carter <sndycrtr at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you, Jeff. I was wondering about the lens on the digital M9 vs the
> film M6.
>
> I'm not much of an extra wide angle user, sometimes though, they can be
> fun!
>
> thanks again for your input.
>
> cheers!
>
> sandy
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Jeff Moore <jbm at jbm.org> wrote:
>
> > 2011-01-13-20:09:16 sandy carter:
> > > Anyone use this lens on an M9. If so, any problem or concerns?
> >
> > Any pictures in this set
> >
> >
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/jbm0/sets/72157625428225585/with/5244230080/
> >
> > which are exteriors and marked as having been taken with an M9, were
> > taken with the C/V 15 (the newer rangefinder-coupled M-mount version).
> >
> > I apologise that nothing here is high-res enough to peep at the pixels.
> >
> > My impression: it's perfectly okay for the price - it costs
> > practically nothing, compared to Leica glass - but the pictures never
> > seem to have that crackling energy of microcontrast and subtle detail
> > you can sometimes get with Leica glass.
> >
> > Which costs a million dollars.
> >
> > And this lens may do better on film than it does on pixels.  Digital
> > sensors make their own demands.
> >
> > I tried a fiddling with which Leica lens I'd lie to the the camera and
> > say was on it, to try to find a good corner-color-correction match,
> > but haven't yet found nirvana there.
> >
> > I don't really know how to make an ultrawide sing, don't use them
> > much, and just can't justify putting money in a Leica lens this wide;
> > so this is as much as I'm willing to buy right now, to have available
> > if needed.  I still consider it worth the price to me, but I'm not in
> > love with it.  Which may be entirely my fault for not putting in
> > enough effort to figure out how to get the most out of it.
> >
> >  -Jeff
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from sndycrtr at gmail.com (sandy carter) ([Leica] Voightlander 15mm)
In reply to: Message from sndycrtr at gmail.com (sandy carter) ([Leica] Voightlander 15mm)
Message from jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore) ([Leica] Voightlander 15mm)
Message from sndycrtr at gmail.com (sandy carter) ([Leica] Voightlander 15mm)