Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes its known as Art Art. -------------------- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ mark at rabinergroup.com Cars: http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb > From: Lawrence Zeitlin <lrzeitlin at gmail.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:40:08 -0500 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: [Leica] Is it art? > > Quan asks, with reference to his photo of a James /dean statue, > > http://1lens.wordpress.com/2010/12/13/james-dean/ > > > "I also wonder when a photographer takes a photograph of someone else's art > work; can he then call his photograph a work of art?" > > - - - - - > > Fear not, Q. Marcel Deuchamp settled this point among artists for all time > by saying "If an artist calls his work 'art', then by definition it is a > work of art." > > > Of course the viewers may not think so but that is their problem, not his. > > > Larry Z > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information