Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Is it art?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 23:22:53 -0500

Yes its known as Art Art.


--------------------
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
mark at rabinergroup.com
Cars:   http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb




> From: Lawrence Zeitlin <lrzeitlin at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:40:08 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: [Leica] Is it art?
> 
> Quan asks, with reference to his photo of a James /dean statue,
> 
>  http://1lens.wordpress.com/2010/12/13/james-dean/
> 
> 
> "I also wonder when a photographer takes a photograph of someone else's art
> work; can he then call his photograph a work of art?"
> 
>  - - - - -
> 
> Fear not, Q. Marcel Deuchamp settled this point among artists for all time
> by saying "If an artist calls his work 'art', then by definition it is a
> work of art."
> 
> 
> Of course the viewers may not think so but that is their problem, not his.
> 
> 
> Larry Z
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Is it art?)