Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks Bob.? The prints look less grainy than the scans (Costco did a decent job of printing and scanning).? I wanted to get as much shutter speed as I could with the f4 lens.? So? I may still sell?my 35-70 in favor of something faster so I can limit my film speed to 800 indoors.? ? Robert --- On Sun, 12/12/10, Bob Adler <rgacpa at yahoo.com> wrote: From: Bob Adler <rgacpa at yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [Leica] de Young visit To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Date: Sunday, December 12, 2010, 9:30 PM Hi Robert, The images look surprisingly good to me. I like the grain and don't find it distracting. The fact that you have done no post processing indicates that the scans have enough information to reduce the grain as well as add vibrancy, if you wish. As Ansel said, the negative is the score; the print is the performance. You could put on a very nice performance with these. Best, Bob Bob Adler Palo Alto, CA http://www.rgaphoto.com ________________________________ From: robert <pitbmail-lug at yahoo.com> To: lug at leica-users.org Sent: Sun, December 12, 2010 9:07:33 PM Subject: [Leica] de Young visit Hi Everyone, Out of curiosity I decided to try 1600 iso film, but i'm not sure I like the grain and flatness.???They pics have minimal processing done after scanning - except for the last photo of the trees.? Any comments would be appreciated. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/robert+a/SF+de+Young/ Robert _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information ? ? ? _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information