Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The M Summilux can not be mounted on a Canon but the late R version can. It is very much better than the Canon, as it should be given the cost. Frank --- On Thu, 18/11/10, James Laird <digiratidoc at gmail.com> wrote: > From: James Laird <digiratidoc at gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Camera-Lens comparisons > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Thursday, 18 November, 2010, 19:50 > Frank, > > I stand corrected. I don't own any Canon glass but I > assumed the 24-70 > would fare better than that. It would have been interesting > though if > they'd been able to mount the Summilux on the 1Ds and then > compare. > Certainly would have been a better test of the relative > merits of the > two sensors. But I guess as Tim said 'it's a camera system > to camera > system comparison. For fun.' > > Jim > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Frank Dernie > <Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com> > wrote: > > As zoom lenses go the Canon 24-105 L lens is > excellent, not a dog. Unless you thing all zooms are dogs, > as I am inclined to. > > I have quite a few lenses of different makes. None > better the 50mm summilux Asph... > > FD > > > > On 18 Nov, 2010, at 18:17, James Laird wrote: > > > >> Don't put a dog > >> of a lens in front of the sensor and compare it > with a Summilux! > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more > information >