Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Depends on what you are trying to achieve in your portrait of course. The Macro Elmar can be made to flare very readily in my experience, rendering results like a much older design. I'd not tolerate that in my other lenses I must comment. Nothing wrong with its resolving power but it is very unlike the modern APO ASPH designs. It also costs a LOT, partly since it is only available (new) as a package with the macro adapter and the angle finder Contrast characteristics are ameliorated in processing providing you expose appropriately of course. For my taste I prefer to have the option of reducing contast and detail selectively from the most modern designs. At least, personally I treat my Macro Elmar as a more specialised lens. A lot of fun to be had with the closer focus attachment though. http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/122535441 Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 7 November 2010 23:23, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > The Macro Elmar-M 90mm f4 would have to be at least for me the ultimate > general portrait solution if I had an M9. > If I had a DMR I'd use 60 macro for most portraiture other than tight > headshots which would then bring me to a 100 macro. > > I have two 90 m's the APO Summicron and the 2.8 Elmarit. I'd use both of > them on two M6's at the same time one with color film in it and one with > black and white in most cases. > And I have a 90 Elmar for my IIIF. > > I have a 135 3.4 APO for tight head shots with my M6's or just a more > formal > flat look. > It was the second M lens I ever owned. > > > -------------------- > Mark William Rabiner > Photography > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > mark at rabinergroup.com > Cars: http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb > > > > > > From: Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> > > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > > Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 14:39:49 +1000 > > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > > Subject: Re: [Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)') > > > > I looked at the new shots after posting and recalled that they were shot > at > > minimum distance too so that invalidates the comparison of the field size > of > > a 90 @ 1m vs. Summicron 75 @ 0.7m If you have the Macro Elmar then you > can > > compare directly yourself of course. > > > > Sorry I don't follow your preference for the APO 90 over the APO 75 when > > already have the Macro Elmar but hey whatever makes sense to you of > course. > > Everyone's ideal lens selction is different/ > > Cheers > > Geoff > > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > NO ARCHIVE > > > > On 7 November 2010 11:39, Tim Gray <tgray at 125px.com> wrote: > > > >> On Nov 07, 2010 at 11:23 AM +1000, Geoff Hopkinson wrote: > >> > >>> I don't know about prices where you are but here at least the 75 is > >>> actually > >>> "cheaper" new than the 90. I don't have any current used prices > >>> comparisons. > >>> > >> > >> New is not going to happen. > >> > >> > >> Anyway some 75 samples if you are interested. I just went out into some > >>> fairly fierce mid morning light and shot some more close ups vs. my > (Macro > >>> Elmar) 90. I think that you will be surprised. I'll post some uncropped > >>> comparisons soon > >>> > >> > >> I'll be interested to see them. > >> > >> I do have the Macro 90 since I feel it makes the perfect travel 90. It > >> gives me a good tight reproduction ratio when you need it, a bit of > extra > >> reach when you need it, and it doesn't take up a lot of space when you > don't > >> need it :) The adapter is also pretty small and lets me focus even more > on > >> something if I am inclined to. > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >