Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)')
From: hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 10:16:00 +1000
References: <AANLkTinZiqvBsvD_wZiQiYR=O8747h0kdGHNSMGWuado@mail.gmail.com> <C8FC1276.622C%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Depends on what you are trying to achieve in your portrait of course.
The Macro Elmar can be made to flare very readily in my experience,
rendering results like a much older design. I'd not tolerate that in my
other lenses I must comment.
Nothing wrong with its resolving power but it is very unlike the modern APO
ASPH designs.
It also costs a LOT, partly since it is only available (new) as a package
with the macro adapter and the angle finder
Contrast characteristics are ameliorated in processing providing you expose
appropriately of course. For my taste I prefer to have the option of
reducing contast and detail selectively from the most modern designs.
At least, personally I treat my Macro Elmar as a more specialised lens. A
lot of fun to be had with the closer focus attachment though.
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/122535441

Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman


On 7 November 2010 23:23, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:

> The Macro Elmar-M 90mm f4 would have to be at least for me the ultimate
> general portrait solution if I had an M9.
> If I had a DMR I'd use 60 macro for most portraiture other than tight
> headshots which would then bring me to a 100 macro.
>
> I have two 90 m's the APO Summicron and the 2.8 Elmarit. I'd use both of
> them on two M6's at the same time one with color film in it and one with
> black and white in most cases.
> And I have a 90 Elmar for my IIIF.
>
> I have a 135 3.4 APO for tight head shots with my M6's or just a more
> formal
> flat look.
> It was the second M lens I ever owned.
>
>
> --------------------
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> mark at rabinergroup.com
> Cars:   http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb
>
>
>
>
> > From: Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com>
> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 14:39:49 +1000
> > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)')
>  >
> >  I looked at the new shots after posting and recalled that they were shot
> at
> > minimum distance too so that invalidates the comparison of the field size
> of
> > a 90 @ 1m vs. Summicron 75 @ 0.7m  If you have the Macro Elmar then you
> can
> > compare directly yourself of course.
> >
> > Sorry I don't follow your preference for the APO 90 over the APO 75 when
> > already have the Macro Elmar but hey whatever makes sense to you of
> course.
> > Everyone's ideal lens selction is different/
> >  Cheers
> > Geoff
> > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> > NO ARCHIVE
> >
> > On 7 November 2010 11:39, Tim Gray <tgray at 125px.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Nov 07, 2010 at 11:23 AM +1000, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
> >>
> >>> I don't know about prices where you are but here at least the 75 is
> >>> actually
> >>> "cheaper" new than the 90. I don't have any current used prices
> >>> comparisons.
> >>>
> >>
> >> New is not going to happen.
> >>
> >>
> >> Anyway some 75 samples if you are interested. I just went out into some
> >>> fairly fierce mid morning light and shot some more close ups vs. my
> (Macro
> >>> Elmar) 90. I think that you will be surprised. I'll post some uncropped
> >>> comparisons soon
> >>>
> >>
> >> I'll be interested to see them.
> >>
> >> I do have the Macro 90 since I feel it makes the perfect travel 90.  It
> >> gives me a good tight reproduction ratio when you need it, a bit of
> extra
> >> reach when you need it, and it doesn't take up a lot of space when you
> don't
> >> need it :)  The adapter is also pretty small and lets me focus even more
> on
> >> something if I am inclined to.
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 80 Summilux R (was 'Am I being stupid? (R content)'))