Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] R Mid-Range Zooms
From: leicaslacker at gmail.com (kyle cassidy on the lug)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:48:47 -0400
References: <AANLkTinWXPOwq7hffo8x41=x=DDFAnxn0KDX94wFt8Fx@mail.gmail.com>
 
I have the 28-70 3.5 -- i think it's just a sigma, built in japan by sigma. 


On Oct 25, 2010, at 8:50 PM, James Laird wrote:

> Just to get off the D700 thread, I'd like the LUG's opinions of the
> 28-70 and 35-70 R zooms. Are they just rebadged Minolta lenses that
> are built better? Opinions for or against would be appreciated. I'm
> looking for a good zoom for my new Sony A900, and would be willing to
> use R glass with an adapter if it's worth the trouble, or should I
> just stick with Minolta/Sony/Zeiss glass?
> 
> Jim Laird
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from jbm at jbm.org (Jeff Moore) ([Leica] R Mid-Range Zooms)
 In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] R Mid-Range Zooms)