Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] D700
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:18:16 -0700
References: <C8EBC754.5907%mark@rabinergroup.com> <C8EBCB4A.3B8D8%chris@chriscrawfordphoto.com>

Don't forget that Minolta bought Konica, so there is a lot of photography
"DNA" in Sony.

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Chris Crawford <
chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com> wrote:

> Because Sony IS a camera company. They've made television cameras (that is,
> digital cameras!) for decades. Most people don't think of that when they
> dismiss Sony as a 'non camera company'. They have more experience making
> non-film cameras than just about anyone. Sony has long made the sensors
> used
> by Nikon, Pentax, and Minolta in their digital SLRs and after Sony took
> over
> Minolta's SLR division they began making digital SLRs too. Minolta's people
> work for them, so they're not really 'new' to that field either.
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Crawford
> Fine Art Photography
> Fort Wayne, Indiana
> 260-486-2581
>
> http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My portfolio
>
> http://blog.chriscrawfordphoto.com  My latest work!
>
> http://www.facebook.com/pages/Christopher-Crawford/48229272798
> Become a fan on Facebook
>
>
>
> On 10/25/10 11:46 PM, "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>
> > I wonder why it is that 99.9999% of photographers out there are using
> Canon
> > Nikon and about 3 of them are going to invest in an unknown entity from a
> > non camera company like this Sony system to do their work?
> >
> > Walkman
> > Home Audio
> > Televisions
> > These are known Sony entities.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------
> > Mark William Rabiner
> > Photography
> > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> > mark at rabinergroup.com
> > Cars:   http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> From: James Laird <digiratidoc at gmail.com>
> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> >> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:58:59 -0500
> >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] D700
> >>
> >> Gene,
> >>
> >> Then they didn't have a 900. Look for one. It's built like a tank,
> >> with magnesium alloy body and rubber weather seals and gaskets, unlike
> >> most of the others in the alpha series. A little noisy, but no worse
> >> than a D300. And you can use R glass with an adapter, I used my old
> >> 400 5.6 on it's shoulder stock today, and of course there's the Zeiss
> >> glass if you can afford it. A little noisy (photo-wise) at higher
> >> ISOs, but the noise is more like film grain, not objectionable at all
> >> to me. The kicker for me, besides the wonderful finder and the
> >> resolution, was always having IS, built in, which was extremely
> >> helpful with the 400. Imagine a circa 1968 Leica Telyt with IS. (As
> >> you can tell I really love this camera.) ;-)
> >>
> >> Jim Laird
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:45 PM,  <grduprey at mchsi.com> wrote:
> >>> Jim,
> >>>
> >>> No, it has been a year and a half since I looked at a Sony DSLR, no
> dealers
> >>> in this area.  The finders of those I looked at were not equal to the
> R8.
> >>>  Going to Texas in December, I will see if I can try one then.
> >>>
> >>> Gene
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "James Laird" <digiratidoc at gmail.com>
> >>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> >>> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 3:59:44 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] D700
> >>>
> >>> Gene,
> >>>
> >>> Have you looked at the Sony A900? Extremely good 24 mp sensor with an
> >>> astoundingly good viewfinder which reminds me of the great finders on
> >>> the Nikon F et al/Leica SL and SL2. Great camera although not cheap,
> >>> except by Leica standards. ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Jim Laird
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:55 PM,  <grduprey at mchsi.com> wrote:
> >>>> Already tried Canon with R glass and was underwhelmed.  Don't care for
> Sony
> >>>> DSLRs, even less as I don't care for canon DSLRs.  I'll take DMR with
> R
> >>>> glass anyway over the alternatives.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Gene
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: "Richard Man" <richard at imagecraft.com>
> >>>> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> >>>> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 1:20:09 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada
> Central
> >>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] D700
> >>>>
> >>>> Some guy on the GETDIP showed some pictures with a 900+ Leica R glass.
> Of
> >>>> course they are only web JPG so you can't really tell, but they look
> good
> >>>> and the person likes the combo.
> >>>>
> >>>> Someone should really compare these combos (DMR vs. A900+R vs. Canikon
> + R)
> >>>> for the poor suffering R glass users :-)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:16 PM, <afirkin at afirkin.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> I was thinking more like a Sony A900 with some Zeiss primes . . .
> >>>>>> actually . . .
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Marty
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Has anyone tried the Sony especially with re-mounted leica glass? I'm
> >>>>> tempted, but there are quite a few "downsides" etc to consider.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>
> >>>>> alastair
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
> >>>> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
> >>>> // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
> >>>> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all
> previous
> >>>> replies in your msgs. ]
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
// icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
// photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] D700)
Message from chris at chriscrawfordphoto.com (Chris Crawford) ([Leica] D700)