Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nikon or Canon Full Frame; All Good (Older User's Perspective)
From: afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com)
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:48:58 -0400
References: <11359F3F-0988-4897-AA91-F8BF81ADE0C4@comcast.net> <7FDD9A84-EB1A-4518-89AB-F55957171AB7@charter.net> <1C5C3CAA-6F2B-4C72-AED0-A5C2569A6586@comcast.net> <B3BA68A3-D55B-434A-B23A-8BDA8EA6D618@charter.net> <A5846CE6-5B27-450A-AC1C-4BDAA8C31214@comcast.net>

Thanks for the "report". All R users are weighing up their options ;-)

> I was drawn to the D700 based on multiple Leitax posts and from other
> internet sources.
>
> I went to Glaser's Camera in Seattle (Leica dealer) and negotiated - as in
> I didn't get stabbed too deeply - and traded of my entire R Kit:  R8, R9,
> 28-90 Asph, 70-180 APO, Motor Drive and Charger for what I thought was
> going to be a D700 with two zooms of similar range (if not quality).
>
> I ended up with a 5D Mk II, 24-105 USM, 70-200 USM MkII and a 430 Mk II
> flash, primarily because the comparable Nikon kit was nearly $900.00 more
> for Nikon.  Because I promised myself whatever I "bought" would have to be
> a net zero transaction.  Nothing personal; just business.
>
> Now in my opinion either camera is a major improvement just for the ease
> of shooting.
>
> So, why all of a sudden this change?
>
> 1.  After roughly 300 exposures, I see that I am now getting back what I
> saw through the view finder, not what the CD yields after scanning Leica R
> negs.  Dynamic Range to Burn.
>
> 2.  Almost all my shots are in focus.  If they're not, it's still my fault
> for not believing what the little red rectangles were trying to tell me.
>
> 3.  The full-frame sensor produces tons of dynamic range and very
> rewarding enlargements.  Of course, same with D700.
>
> 4.  No more tiresome whining about poor shots to my patient,
> long-suffering wife.
>
> 5.  I really grew tired of waiting for an R10 to hook up with my legacy
> Leica glass.
>
> 6. Oh yeah, and I'm not getting any younger (indirect quote from Dr. Ted).
>
> So my only film camera now is the trusty Contax T2 which is in rehab while
> I look for a replacement back door - the Kyocera Ceramic film pressure
> plate developed a hairline crack, rendering all exposures just slightly
> out of focus.  My wife can't wait for it to get well - she loves the
> camera and what it yields.  But it's a keeper.
>
> To be sure, the Canon(Nikon) lenses are no match for the heft, haptics and
> results of Leica glass, but I've also been a bit amazed at the results
> from the new 70-200, especially hand held.  Come to think of it, the new
> 24-70 makes a great "on-camera" lens when I use it properly.
>
> This isn't about D700 vs 5D Mk II.  It's about the freedom for an older
> guy with a less steady hand and focusing eye to harvest images worthy of
> keeping in iPhoto for later "migration" to Aperture for serious fine
> tuning.
>
> This change has been so easy I almost felt guilty.  But I don't.
>
> I'm enjoying photography again and will continue to contribute to the LUG
> as long I can be helpful and learn from such a fine collection of ladies
> and gentleman photographers.
>
>
> Cheers,   Bob in Seattle
>
>
> Bob Shaw
> rsphotoimages at comcast.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>




In reply to: Message from rsphotoimages at comcast.net (Bob Shaw) ([Leica] Nikon or Canon Full Frame; All Good (Older User's Perspective))