Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] D700
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:53:59 -0400

Its been completely designed optically 4 different times.
Its like saying you don't like Texas.


--------------------
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
mark at rabinergroup.com
Cars:   http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb




> From: Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:04:18 +1030
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] D700
> 
> The new 24-120 is just as bad as the first one.  I don't know if it's
> been redesigned optically, but it is cosmetically different and has
> AF-S and VR.  When I tested a Nikon D700 that was the lens that Nikon
> sent with the camera.  I thought something was wrong with the camera
> until I tried it with some better glass.
> 
> I agree on VR; it's great.  It's just a shame that subject movement
> makes it less useful for what I do, but a camera with built-in
> anti-shake and good f1.4 lenses would be nice.
> 
> Marty
> 
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
> wrote:
>>> From what I know the 24-120 established a bad rep from day one but was
>> completely redone a few years later then completely redone again then a 
>> few
>> years later completely redone again with VR. It could be ok by now though 
>> I
>> like zooms which vear on the conservative side. But the 24-120 has VR.
>> And VR is a not to be an underestimated game changer.
>> 
>> Voucher Recharge
>> Verification Requirement
>> 
>> 
>> --------------------
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> Photography
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>> mark at rabinergroup.com
>> Cars: ? http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> From: Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 12:19:10 +1030
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] D700
>>> 
>>> I don't like zooms. ?The 24-70 2.8 AF-S is decent. ?The 24-120 is the
>>> worst; the real dog of the Nikkor range.
>>> 
>>> Just about any wide range zoom is hopeless for architectural work.
>>> 
>>> Marty
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] D700)
Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil) ([Leica] D700)
In reply to: Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] D700)