Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]1200 is the magic number for me on the long side coincidently enough I've done a lot of crunching with it set at that. All feels right with the world when I hit the long side with a 1200. I think its big enough to get the full effect of Leica glow. Or lack of. My favorite photographers websites are not cinchy with their pic sizes and I call 1200 not cinchy. Its because our images as so famous no one would dare steal them. Or so indelible. Another thing I do more and more is just open the image with the raw adobe cs5 filter at the smallest setting which is 1024 x 1530 if I did not crop the blazes out of it which I almost always do. If both of the dimensions go below 1000 I up the ante going to the higher rez opening setting. I like at least one of my dimensions to be over 999. Then I know they won't be asking for their money back. -------------------- Mark William Rabiner Photography http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ mark at rabinergroup.com > From: Ric Carter <ricc at embarqmail.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:54:29 -0400 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] proper size for photo on the web > > i just jumped a couple of weeks ago from 800 to 1000 > > ric > > > On Oct 18, 2010, at 11:51 AM, kyle cassidy on the LUG wrote: > >> For a long time I'd been posting images at 800 pixels across as that was >> "full screen" for a lot of monitors. lately i've switched to 1200 pixels >> as >> 800 seems woefully small now on my monitors. >> >> thoughts? >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information