Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] DMR Battery Information
From: afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com)
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:34:05 -0400
References: <7874514.1287312685722.JavaMail.root@wamui-bucket.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

Doug, I have seen wonderful images made by all the cameras you mention.
Perhaps some of the credit belongs to the person behind the camera? I love
the images the DMR makes, but I'm not sure they will "alone" save my
photography ;-)

Cheers

Alastair

> It reminds me of when the first battery-dependent cameras became
> available.  Many old-time photographers pointed out - quite loudly, too -
> that once the batteries in these new-fangled electronificated cameras died
> the camera was a paperweight.
>
> The DMR's battery capacity isn't as good as most other DSLR cameras.  Big
> Freaking Deal!  The last time I had an opportunity to compare results from
> the DMR with other DSLR cameras was at a California Raptor Center open
> house event, where several of us in a Northern California group worked
> side-by-side (the others were there at my invitation).  It's pretty much a
> no-brainer that I was the only one using a DMR; the other cameras were
> D300, 20D and 5D IIRC.  The event was outdoors on a dark, overcast
> drizzly/rainy day under the cover of several mature oak and redwood trees.
>
> On spec sheets the R8/DMR was a poor choice for this event: no high-ISO
> capacity, no IS or VR lenses, no weather sealing, slow frame rate, and
> there's that wimpy battery capacity thing too.  During the event I wiped
> the water off the camera as much as I could, changed batteries as needed,
> and retreated to the truck during particularly rainy spells.  Once we all
> got our results & compared them the differences were startling.  The other
> photographers photos looked fine until they were compared (all on the same
> monitor) with the DMR photos: their photos had weaker colors, clipped
> highlights and weaker shadow detail.  The clarity, color quality and tonal
> range of the photos from the DMR was startlingly better.  Seems to me that
> changing batteries is a small price to pay for these results.
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>




Replies: Reply from topoxforddoc at btinternet.com (Charlie Chan) ([Leica] DMR Battery Information)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] DMR Battery Information)