Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]As in a theory of relativity and subjective comparisons. Sent from my iPad On Oct 9, 2010, at 17:14, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > Because I know that a 250 on a Hasselblad is a is a 180 on a Leica. > > > -------------------- > Mark William Rabiner > Photography > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > mark at rabinergroup.com > > >> From: Frank Filippone <red735i at earthlink.net> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 09:46:16 -0700 (GMT-07:00) >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] One Big Expensive Leica Lens >> >> Mark.. are you talking about an enlarged print or the actual "negative"? >> Given that the lensescome from Leica and Zeiss, lens quality is probably >> pretty equal... YOu might want to ask POP PHOTO to do a lens >> comparison..... >> >> WHy do you think a 1600mm would have a much larger magnification than a >> 1700? >> The difference is 100/1600 or roughly 6%?? >> >> Frank >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> >>> Sent: Oct 9, 2010 1:41 AM >>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] One Big Expensive Leica Lens >>> >>> Will I'd think somebody could do the math and then they do and you're >>> right >>> and I'm wrong I'll concede. >>> But my money goes to Leica is going to have not a slightly more >>> magnification. But a lot more. >>> You read it here first. Its in writing. Right here. >>> Prove me wrong I'll eat crow with Bosco. >>> >>> -------------------- >>> Mark William Rabiner >>> Photography. >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ >>> mark at rabinergroup.com >>> >>> >>>> From: Frank Filippone <red735i at earthlink.net> >>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>>> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 23:46:09 -0700 (GMT-07:00) >>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] One Big Expensive Leica Lens >>>> >>>> Not quite correct... 1600 or 1700mm .... about the same FL and >>>> magnification. >>>> >>>> The difference is in the recorded angle of view.... >>>> The Leica is set for 35mm, the Zeiss for 6x6. >>>> The angle of view on the Leica lens is about half .... only because the >>>> Leica >>>> Film is recording the center of the image.... >>>> >>>> Frank >>>> >>>> >>>>> Not sure how you interpreted what I wrote. The Leica lens will >>>>> magnify more. A lot more. >>>>> >>>>> Marty >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information