Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Tea for one, or tea for two?
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:36:53 +0200
References: <DAE10D35-8D80-43A1-9B13-CEC9F3CF86B1@mac.com>

Photography should always look as simple as these.

Kudos Hugh

Amiti?s
Philippe

Le 23 sept. 10 ? 19:26, Hugh Thompson a ?crit :

>
> On a trip to Qarabagh, in the country north of Kabul today, we  
> visited the office of an English language school, where we had tea:
>
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Hugh+Thompson/Afghanistan_001/Tea+for+one+or+tea+for+two++004.jpg.html
>  
> >
>
> and
>
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Hugh+Thompson/Afghanistan_001/Tea+for+one+or+tea+for+two++005.jpg.html
>  
> >
>
> Hugh
>
> C&Ss most welcome
>
>
> "Keep cheerful and smile, sometimes it is all you have"
>
> hewthompson at mac.com
> Kabul, Afghanistan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>




Replies: Reply from hewthompson at mac.com (Hugh Thompson) ([Leica] IMG: Tea for one, or tea for two?)
In reply to: Message from hewthompson at mac.com (Hugh Thompson) ([Leica] IMG: Tea for one, or tea for two?)