Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Unacceptable camera
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:18:01 -0700

Tina, I don't see Leica-equivalence Canikon being rejected on the list :-)

Also, interestingly enough, at least two 6 megapixels (they made cameras
with that low a resolution??!!!) made it to the recommended list. The Contax
N digital and the Mark Rabiner's rejected Epson R-D1. Both of which are like
10 generations old or something.

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> 
wrote:

> Check it out:
>
> http://www.alamy.com/contributor/help/unsuitable-cameras.asp
>
> <http://www.alamy.com/contributor/help/unsuitable-cameras.asp>Tina
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
// icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
// photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]


Replies: Reply from michiel.fokkema at gmail.com (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] Unacceptable camera)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] NOW..... Unacceptable camera LEICA S2.... :-))