Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New R Solution?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:02:50 -0400

The square looks smaller than 36mm in this case.
It looks like s 30 inch square.

--------------------
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
mark at rabinergroup.com


> From: Rei Shinozuka <shino at panix.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:28:50 -0400
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] New R Solution?
> 
>   of another way of visualizing how the rectangular or square crops fit
> onto the image circle:
> 
> http://www.rytterfalk.com/wp-content/upload/1253263718-sensors.jpg
> 
> given a fixed image coverage circle, the maximally circumscribed
> rectangle cannot be extended into a maximally circumscribed square
> without reducing the longer dimension (36mm in this case.)
> 
> for 35mm the square format which would fit into lens coverage would be
> 30.5mmx30.5mm.
> 
> -rei
> 
> 
> On 09/07/2010 10:16 AM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>> The rectangular or square diagonal = diameter of circle
>> 
>> <  http://www.mathopenref.com/rectanglediagonals.html>
>> 
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george at imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 7, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Douglas Sharp wrote:
>> 
>>> George,
>>> 
>>> not sure if my logic is a little off, but if a lens covers 36 mm
>>> horizontally and we are talking about an image CIRCLE not an OVAL, I 
>>> expect
>>> it will cover a 36 mm square format too.
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Douglas
>>> 
>>> On 07.09.2010 15:41, George Lottermoser wrote:
>>>> As wonderful as that would be;
>>>> it would also cost way too much money (for me);
>>>> and I'm not sure the full line of R lenses would cover that image 
>>>> circle.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> George Lottermoser
>>>> george at imagist.com
>>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Sonny Carter wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Why not a 36 x36?
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka) ([Leica] New R Solution?)