Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That's probably why I work with words and not numbers :-) Thanks George! Cheers Douglas On 07.09.2010 16:16, George Lottermoser wrote: > The rectangular or square diagonal = diameter of circle > > < http://www.mathopenref.com/rectanglediagonals.html> > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > > > On Sep 7, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Douglas Sharp wrote: > >> George, >> >> not sure if my logic is a little off, but if a lens covers 36 mm >> horizontally and we are talking about an image CIRCLE not an OVAL, I >> expect it will cover a 36 mm square format too. >> >> Cheers >> Douglas >> >> On 07.09.2010 15:41, George Lottermoser wrote: >>> As wonderful as that would be; >>> it would also cost way too much money (for me); >>> and I'm not sure the full line of R lenses would cover that image circle. >>> >>> Regards, >>> George Lottermoser >>> george at imagist.com >>> http://www.imagist.com >>> http://www.imagist.com/blog >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >>> >>> >>> On Sep 7, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Sonny Carter wrote: >>> >>>> Why not a 36 x36? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >