Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]and twice the chance of being on as well. ;~) Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Aug 27, 2010, at 2:16 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > To me a person can be in danger of having a delusional ideal of the > value of > their images. > Its also possible they can have great images but be delusional > about the > value of their writing that goes along side these images. > So that's twice the chance of being off. > > -------------------- > Mark William Rabiner > Photography > mark at rabinergroup.com > > >> From: Lottermoser George <imagist3 at mac.com> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:13:27 -0500 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: Re: [Leica] Searching? >> >> Perhaps I received Kyle's message "wrong." >> >> I certainly agree with your interpretation. >> >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser >> george at imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com/blog >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >> >> >> >> >> >> On Aug 26, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Richard Man wrote: >> >>> I think what you say below is different from what Kyle means. If >>> I may: any >>> good image should be good without words, but some images become more >>> powerful, and perhaps a DIFFERENT image, when paired with the >>> right words. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information