Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LUG Digest, Vol 46, Issue 120
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 03:06:07 -0400

Me too.
But soon digital backs for our Blad systems will cost at least the same if
not less then full frame 35mm digital cameras. If they aren't already. I
think they are. Make it they'll cost what I could maybe afford. A couple of
grand. I think I'll get a job in a car wash. I hear you can get a lot in
tips. I'll wear an "abs" foam shirt. Pecs too.

--------------------
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
mark at rabinergroup.com


> From: Bill and Sue Pearce <bs.pearce at cox.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:27:04 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] LUG Digest, Vol 46, Issue 120
> 
>  35mm certainly ruled for Photojournalism the last
> several decades.
> You bring a Hassy to a pigmy hut I'm sure the head pygmy is going to ask 
> you
> for your credentials.
> Your just going to come across as some weird kind of "fine art"
> photographer. Suspect anywhere.
> 
> Dead on, mark. I don't have the heart to sell my blad outfit, but that's my
> problem. There was never a camera that I felt as comfortable with using.
> That is a big thing, really. When I feel comfortable, I get better photos.
> 
> Bill Pearce
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] LUG Digest, Vol 46, Issue 120)
In reply to: Message from bs.pearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] LUG Digest, Vol 46, Issue 120)