Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for the clarification re: capturing "the print" digitally. makes sense. The few times I've tried that (using a flatbed scanner) I ended up seeing the texture of the paper. I can understand where a good copy set up would provide some control to prevent that. Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Jul 31, 2010, at 11:58 PM, Alan Magayne-Roshak wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote: > >> Wonderful, eclectic set of images Alan. >> I noticed that the Hasselbad shot of the clock >> shows a C1ds in the exif >> did you use the canon to capture the negative? > >> just curious > >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser > ==================================================================================================== > (BTW, thanks Lluis, Jim, Montie, and George for your kudos.) > > George, I scan some old and all new (35mm) negatives to digitize them, but > I copy many from prints, on a copy stand with the Canon 1Ds. > After I've gone through the trouble of burning and dodging in the > darkroom, I figure it makes sense to copy the print that is the way I want > it, rather than having to start over with a scan, and I don't have the > means to scan my MF and LF negs anyway. > > Alan > > Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer > UPAA POY 1978 > University Information Technology Services > University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee > amr3 at uwm.edu > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/ > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information