Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The alteration certainly gives the photo more impact. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ric Carter" <ricc at embarqmail.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 10:21 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Altered Photo > PS > > the alteration does not offend me in the least > > ric > > > On Jul 20, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Ric Carter wrote: > >> "In adherence with our zero tolerance policy on photo manipulation" >> >> It's living in a fool's paradise or lying to the clientele or having NO >> concept of what photos are >> >> But, we've had this discussion many times without conclusion -- mot >> recently with an identical problem--someone removed from the picture >> >> It's all about some phoney concept of reality that does not in reality >> exist >> >> they're pictures, not reality, but impressions of it rendered by people >> with opinions >> >> The only way to avoid that is to place the viewer at the point of action, >> in which case you don't need the photographer >> >> ric >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jul 20, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Tina Manley wrote: >> >>> >>> So where do you draw the line? >>> >>> http://pdnedu.blogs.com/pdn_pulse/2010/07/getty-photographer-fired-over-altered-golf-photo.html >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >