Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] How many 21mm Summilux users here? Are you all happy with the lens?
From: dmorton at gmail.com (David Morton)
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:43:53 +0100
References: <AANLkTikY-NWb6PMdcHXI9Q0Vx3rPO1dtiXfSRkAPh3_t@mail.gmail.com> <C8663F8A.6482B%mark@rabinergroup.com> <AANLkTikBg8MvcbTCwTpRTiU--twZV4amnvVR91-rIrNg@mail.gmail.com>

Does your 90mm Elmar C work well on your M6 and M8? I know there's
just a short throw to cover its range of focus; is this a problem at
all?

I have heard all kinds of cautions and caveats over the years about
them on M bodies other than the CL.

On 16 July 2010 22:36, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com>
>>
>> Yes the value of Elmarit ?bellies are going down while Lux bellies are 
>> going
>> up.
>> We'd then ask to see what results from your 21mm f2.8 ASPH And what f1.4
>> would ask to the work. As if that had any meaning to the discussion.
>>
>> Its sounding much more ?like "what's the lens we have to have now" to show
>> how rich or cool we are.
>>
>> I do think the example on the LUG the acronym being what it is is USE not
>> ownership and buying and selling.
>
> I'm pretty sensitive to the subject of 21 mm lenses.
>
> The first 21 I didn't buy was an M4 and an 21 SA f4 with finder for
> $500 back in 1985.? I spent the money on a Kaypro computer, if you can
> imagine.
>
> Fast forward to when Voigtlander/Cosina introduced those midget 21
> lenses.? I bought one and liked it.
>
> A little later, I had a chance to make a bargain on a 21 Elmarit 2.8
> pre-asph as part of a batch of gear, and promptly sold it to GeeBee,
> because it is such a big lens.
>
> Two years ago, I found a 21 Super Angulon? f3.4 with a little haze in
> it for real cheap.? I sent it to DAG, and he cleaned it right up, and
> its a right nice lens.? I'm learning to use it, especially now that
> I'm shooting more film.? It is more fun with film than with the M8.
> There's a nice discussion on these old fellows in the Tom Abrahamsson
> section of RFF
>
> ?I kept the teeny VC 21 until just recently, and I gave it to a young
> friend who need such a lens.
>
> Back to Rab's subject, I was looking at my lens list, and it is not
> too exotic.? I ?have fun with them though.
>
> 15mm Voigtl?nder,? 21mm Super-Angulon f4,??28mm Elmarit asph,? 35mm
> Summicron asph,?40mm Summicron C (shows 35mm frames), 50mm DR
> Summicron (fixed for M8),?75 mm Summarit, 90mm Elmar C, 90mm
> Tele-Elmarit.
>
> Usually the M8 gets the 35, and the M6 gets the 40. ?I keep the 21 on my M2
>
>
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
>
> USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] How many 21mm Summilux users here? Are you all happy with the lens?)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] How many 21mm Summilux users here? Are you all happy with the lens?)
In reply to: Message from dmorton at gmail.com (David Morton) ([Leica] How many 21mm Summilux users here? Are you all happy with the lens?)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] How many 21mm Summilux users here? Are you all happy with the lens?)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] How many 21mm Summilux users here? Are you all happy with the lens?)