Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] "Re"
From: ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 15:21:43 -0400
References: <p06240809c8592f4c6407@[192.168.1.103]>

I select the portion of the message I'm replying to

then hit the reply button on the message I wish to answer

the rest seems to take care of itself

ric


On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Herbert Kanner wrote:

> Yesterday, I sent the query in the following paragraph to "mailman at 
> leica-users.org" as directed by the web site. THe mail bounced as "user 
> unknown".
> 
> I notice that all "Re [some LUG contribution]" have a standard format, 
> indicating that they are semi-automatically generated. So, what is the 
> technique for responding to a particular LUG item? I can't believe that 
> there is that much uniformity in format if people clipped out the item and 
> formulated their response email by hand.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Herb
> -- 
> Herbert Kanner
> kanner at acm.org
> 650-326-8204
> 
> Do not meddle in the affairs of cats,
> for they are subtle and will pee
> on your computer!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] "Re")
In reply to: Message from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] "Re")