Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 21mm f1.4 Summilux - the next "must have?"
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 06:39:29 +0100
References: <AANLkTin0pSQtgYhcFwu0REY6Gyam0Sf_pGiRcFKUwkS7@mail.gmail.com><C858175C.64223%mark@rabinergroup.com><AANLkTimUl-ZdQwD4sOsWPSOB4NYcbVNaEgJ9lQOzVg7K@mail.gmail.com> <CCA84FC0-3FE3-4610-89FF-9D158298989F@btinternet.com> <82A1ECDE190F410FB7C142522A0A7FB6@jimnichols>

I'm no purist, but 35mm is a frequently used lens for me, it is already 
vague enough...
Frank

On 6 Jul, 2010, at 06:31, Jim Nichols wrote:

> That seems easy to overcome, except for purists.  You change the mechanism 
> to deliver a 37.5 view, and use it for both lenses.
> 
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Dernie" <Frank.Dernie at 
> btinternet.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 12:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 21mm f1.4 Summilux - the next "must have?"
> 
> 
>> Also, there is no room on the current frame line mechanism for 40 as well 
>> as 35 framelines.
>> Frank
>> 
>> On 6 Jul, 2010, at 04:43, Marty Deveney wrote:
>> 
>>> Leica are happy to make external viewfinders that they can sell at
>>> additional cost to the bodies but modifying the frameline sets in the
>>> camera, with assoiated increased manufacturing costs doesn't seem to
>>> please them.  I don't want an external finder and I doubt Leica are
>>> going to make a lens for thirty year old CLs and CLEs or (I imagine
>>> this would give Leica a shudder) the Cosina R3A/M.  But I also accept
>>> that I can't expect Leica to make everything that I think I want.
>>> 
>>> Marty
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>>> A new 40 would be very nice.  Leica they seem reluctant to have
>>>>> different finder frameline sets or magnifications except with the a la
>>>>> carte price premium, so I don't think a 40 seems likely.  But it would
>>>>> be nice, Leica, if you're listening...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Marty
>>>> 
>>>> Having come out with an 18 and the tri elmar wide maybe they are liking
>>>> making viewfinders now and selling them. I think making those two 
>>>> optics may
>>>> have loosened them up a bit on that end.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> [Rabs]
>>>> Mark William Rabiner
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] 21mm f1.4 Summilux - the next "must have?")
In reply to: Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] 21mm f1.4 Summilux - the next "must have?")
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 21mm f1.4 Summilux - the next "must have?")
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] 21mm f1.4 Summilux - the next "must have?")
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] 21mm f1.4 Summilux - the next "must have?")
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] 21mm f1.4 Summilux - the next "must have?")