Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/06/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Film/slide scanner recommendations? Samples? Anyone use Braun?
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol)
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 22:15:20 +0200
References: <AANLkTil6FzfhRvBhHN5v_DY0CrqGcsjd3OVEubJaJqnv@mail.gmail.com> <C82F19D1.6335D%mark@rabinergroup.com> <AANLkTinr2GJ58aSSju4E8GIRLVFYeiCNpakUPKAyk_WN@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20100607120236.03003240@med.cornell.edu>

I agree your opinion. I think that V700 give enough good quality.

Saludos
Lluis


El 07/06/2010, a las 18:17, Chris Saganich escribi?:

> The Epson V750 and V750 pro with anti-reflectance glass have  
> replaced film scanners.  What is left on the market is only used  
> equipment or very high-end professional gear like the Imacon which  
> is needed if giant gallery prints are to be made.  Again the final  
> use of the scans have to be explicit before deciding what level of  
> equipment is needed.  The Epson V750 Pro was my second choice and  
> would have replaced both my dead film scanner and my aging flatbed  
> scanner.  I had reservations regarding a flatbed scanner due mostly  
> to 35mm film flatness and focus issues which can be overcome by the  
> additional purchase of anti newton glass inserts for the Epson film  
> holder.  The cost of the scanner $800 for the V750 Pro plus AN glass  
> tipped the price scale for me at this time so I went with the less  
> expensive alternative, a used film scanner.  I hope to get 4 or five  
> years out of it.  I would go with the V750pro if new is an important  
> issue and be confident that the results will be as good as any film  
> scanner for the same price range.  Again, If were planning a gallery  
> show with large prints >16x20 then non of these mid range scanners  
> will cut it anyway.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> At 10:12 PM 6/4/2010, you wrote:
>> Plenty of google'able people who review scanners will say the  
>> flatbed is
>> fine for slides, but I think the LUG is made up of photogs whose  
>> technical
>> standards are higher (hope that doesn't sound too snobby), which is  
>> why I'm
>> asking in this forum.  While we all know just about any 35/1.4 in  
>> the hands
>> of a capable photog will produce fine results, I think we also know  
>> that
>> there are undeniable differences between Leica-quality 35's and  
>> those from
>> other mfrs.  So I'm asking those that know... please recommend a  
>> current
>> film scanner capable of producing superb results.  Not flatbed  
>> quality (from
>> what I've seen).
>>
>> I'm afraid Tina's right.. nobody's developing film scanners  
>> anymore.  No
>> real point...  Maybe time to turn to the used market, but even  
>> then, prices
>> are ridiculously high.
>>
>> --Andrew
>> NO ARCHIVE
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from andrew.nv1b at gmail.com (Andrew Moore) ([Leica] Film/slide scanner recommendations? Samples? Anyone use Braun?)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Film/slide scanner recommendations? Samples? Anyone use Braun?)
Message from andrew.nv1b at gmail.com (Andrew Moore) ([Leica] Film/slide scanner recommendations? Samples? Anyone use Braun?)
Message from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] Film/slide scanner recommendations? Samples? Anyone use Braun?)