Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/05/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Vince, My M4 doesn't have the red dot. Perhaps you could trade her your IIIf for it.... What and where do you teach? Robert On May 21, 2010, at 3:03 PM, Vince Passaro wrote: > Anecdote: I took out to lunch a potential new student and her > father today; > she's likely coming to our program. Then she came back to my office to > handle some class registration stuff. Saw my IIIf (which needs > repairs) up > on the shelf. "I have a camera that looks something like this," she > said. > "It was a gift from my grandmother." I showed her the rear of mine > and > said, does it have two holes to look through or one? "One," she said. > > "Does it say Leica," I now ask, feeling a bit like the wolf in > Little Red > Ridinghood. "I don't know," she says, "I basically just put it > away as some > kind of antique." > > I figured it was an M2 or M3 as they are closest "one-hole" > relatives to the > IIIf visually; unless it was a Canon or some other 1950s > rangefinder. I sat > down and started up the computer to take care of her registration > issues. > > "It has this BIG red dot on it," she says suddenly. I stop typing. > "Bring > that with you in the fall," I tell her. "I'll show you how to use > it." My > fangs are dripping now. "Does it have a lens?" I say, > backtracking. "Oh > yes," she says. "I think there are two." > > You'll find me in my office baying at the moon, I almost say. > > Was it the M4 or the M6 that was the first to have the red dot? > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information