Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/05/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for looking Mark (and thanks also to anyone else I've missed). Maybe worthwhile clarifying a couple of points: The LUG galleries (thanks again Brian for this resource!) allow you to adjust your available image sizes and I normally have just one after you click the thumbnail. This shot is a crop from the full file and is at 100% so every pixel is there in what you see. Noise/grain: The M9 is probably a stop or so better than the M8 there and there are big advances in later Lightroom versions for capture sharpening and noise reduction. Those are inter-related and underexposure is very bad ju-ju. Basically you can preserve all of the finer detail while reducing noise in areas of more continuous tone (like the OoF areas). Maybe I can post some thoughts on the LUG Pearls Wiki. Good tripod and careful technique. So 1/30th not a problem here. These were just casual shots without any elaborate setup. Flash is another skill set and circumstance of course. Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 13 May 2010 10:16, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > > Today I received a macro adapter for my Macro Elmar 90 and tried it out > on > > my M9 (ISO 800 100% crop). > > No Valanga Irregularis were harmed in the making of this portrait > > > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/hoppyman/2/ghcu.jpg.html > > > > Cheers > > Geoff > > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman > > > > > That beats the **&^% out of the 5D shot I just saw 10 minutes ago out of > the > lug gallery Sure wish when I clicked on it it got bigger at all let alone > like it did. > Its an internet convention. > see > Click > Make bigger > I start to drool on the bell when I click but then no dog bone. > It looks like an electron microscope shot. > > And proves the wise adage that if you want macro a rangefinder camera is > the > wrong tool for the job use an SLR. > > Which proves what I always say. > The rule is usually wrong. Its always what you don't think. > > As its so totally grainless I wonder if you don't have the color anti noise > setting cranked up just a bit high hurting sharpness as here we are at iso > 800 and it looks like 100. But too small to really tell. > > This much sharpness macro at 1/30th of a second is pretty mystical. > > People into shooting like this often find its very much about using a flash > so you can BOTH stop down and have a blazingly high shutter speed. As both > is very much more so needed in the macro realm than in the normal realm. > You just use a dedicated cord. No one dreams you've used a flash. And its a > convention. You get when people are used to seeing. > But you pretty much did it without one here. > > [Rabslov] > Mark William Rabiner > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >