Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/05/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: Why God Made UV Filters
From: shino at panix.com (Rei Shinozuka)
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 11:01:46 -0400
References: <6936541.1272983658796.JavaMail.root@wamui-cynical.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <j2l23a0a61f1005040741o650b49bfncd40e64cca222d1@mail.gmail.com> <7C342DD1-4DB6-401C-8A48-2B88AA1F14A1@mac.com>
 
I guess the Vales want you to buy their book to find out.

http://www.upi.com/Odd_News/2009/10/23/Book-Dog-SUV-have-same-carbon-footprint/UPI-30131256332111/

I'll bet their models are just like any models: the results are only as 
good as the assumptions that went into them.

-rei



On 05/04/2010 10:46 AM, George Lottermoser wrote:
> find this very hard to believe.
>
> what methodology was used to arrive at this conclusion?
> was the total life from conception to disposal and feeding measured 
> for 40 lb dog and SUV?
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
> On May 4, 2010, at 9:41 AM, simon jessurun wrote:
>
>> recently learned that having a pet like a medium sized dog has a
>> larger carbon footprint then a SUV
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: Why God Made UV Filters)
 In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] OT: Why God Made UV Filters)
Message from simon.apekop at gmail.com (simon jessurun) ([Leica] OT: Why God Made UV Filters)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: Why God Made UV Filters)