Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I used to underexpose by 1/3 and sometimes 2/3 stop. But I no longer do that. LR3 is so good at recovering highlights that I don't worry about it anymore and I think the files are better exposed correctly. Tina On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Stan Yoder <s.yoder at verizon.net> wrote: > The conventional wisdom with the M8 (which I followed) was to underexpose a > bit to make sure highlights weren't blown, then resurrect shadow detail in > post. Also, some felt that underexposing at high ISOs kept the noise down. > > So, to those of you with M9s, are you continuing to do that for either or > both reasons (assuming you did so with your M8s)? Or do you no longer find > it useful or necessary? > > TIA, > Stan Yoder > > BTW, great to meet some of you at the Savannah LHSA shoot. > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > -- Tina Manley, ASMP www.tinamanley.com