Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The M3 photo is a better composition, but the M8 photo has better skin tones (at least on my iMac). But there are too many variables involved to make a valid technical comparison, most important being that you are using different lenses and scanning film vs. direct digital capture. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog On Apr 17, 2010, at 5:19 PM, Peter Cheyne wrote: > I took these two photos of my friend's son a couple of weeks ago. I was > interested to see the differences. > > M3, Kodak E100VS, Nokton 35 > http://www.flickr.com/photos/geordiepete/4514083293/sizes/l/ > > M8, ISO 160, Summicron 50 > http://www.flickr.com/photos/geordiepete/4492995105/sizes/l/ > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >